An official note proving that there is no presumption of innocence in political trials in Venezuela.- The case of Capriles Radonsky.

March 28, 2006

Scanning the official Ministry of Information pages of the
government of Venezuela
(the MINCI pages), I found the following news:

The Ambassador of Cuba will ask that the major of Baruta be
investigated

Here is the link:
http://www.mci.gob.ve/noticiasnuev.asp?numn=9550

I was quite intrigued by the title and, as a curious ghost
blogger that I am, started reading and digging some information about the case.

Henrique Capriles Radonsky is the very popular mayor of the
town of Baruta, in the East part of
Caracas where the Cuban Embassy is
located.

During the events of April 2002, a group of angry and
radical anti-Chavez people were protesting in front of the Cuban Embassy. After
being called by the Cuban Ambassador, Capriles Radownsky went to the site and talked with him.
According to Capriles, he assured the Ambassador that he was going to do
whatever was possible to insure the security of the diplomatic personnel and he
asked the protesters to leave the place, which they did.

After those events, the Public Ministry started an
investigation on the case and the Fiscalia accused Capriles Radonsky. Capriles was actually put in jail for several
months supposedly to prevent his leaving the country because the prosecution
said that he was not present on three occasions after being called. According
to Capriles, his lawyers were denied the access to the file where the
prosecution declarations were stated.

It follows a long and complicated judicial tail.

At one point even the TSJ declared that Capriles had been
sent to jail in an unjustified manner, but somehow the case was reopened.

The
Capriles version of the events can be found here and here.

Capriles asked recently that he be judged in an impartial
manner and he denounced that the Cuban Ambassador had meetings with
representatives of the Judicial Power (see here).

After this long introduction, I can take you back to the
note that called my attention and that appeared on March 23, 2006, on the very official MINCI
pages.

The page shows the communiqu of the Cuban Embassy not only
denying the allegations of Capriles (which would have been the normal thing to do
for a diplomatic entity) but also ASKING THE GOVERNMENT OF VENEZUELA TO
INVESTIGATE WHY HE IS MAKING THOSE ALLEGATIONSI mean, the guy was put in jail,
has been harassed for several years for this event, his case has been reopened .In
my humble ghost blogger opinion the guy has every legitimate right to be
concerned about the fairness of his trial and scared at the possibility that
the Cuban representatives be in contact with anyone in the Venezuelan judicial
system that is going to judge him

But although I am quite bothered by the answer of the Cuban Embassy,
that is not what bothered me the most. What really put me in the alarm mode and
triggered me to write this post was the following paragraph that clearly
demonstrates the current state of justice, fairness and separation of powers in
Venezuela. It was
written by the officials in charge of the Venezuelan Ministry of Information
pages (I copy it verbatim in Spanish)

El alcalde, que en los das del golpe de estado de 2002 tuvo una
participacin en los actos de asedio a la embajada cubana, al no impedir que la
turba violenta mantuviera incomunicada a la sede durante 3 das, acusa al
embajador de conspirar en el pas.

A continuacin la nota completa emitida por la sede
diplomtica:

The
translation :

          The
mayor, that during the days of the coup of 2002 had a participation in the acts
of siege of the Cuban Embassy when he did not prevent that the violent crowd
maintained the Embassy without communications during 3 days, accuses the
Ambassador to conspire in the country.

   

In what follows we present the complete note issued by the diplomatic
see.

So what we essentially have here is the OFFICIAL pages of
the Goverment of Venezuela SAYING that a citizen that will stand
trial is already GUILTY. The note is written in the affirmative, there is no
presumption of innocence whatsoever in this note.

And this is the same government that claims that there is
justice and independence of Powers in Venezuela.

Reporting from Cyberspace,

Jorge Arena
Curious ghost blogger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 11,237 other followers

%d bloggers like this: