New Electoral Bill: When 99% control is not enough

May 26, 2009

Lots to tell after a month away, but perhaps what has surprised me the month is the proposed new Electoral Bill which reduces minority representation and gives the Electoral Board (CNE) the ability to redesign voting districts at will.

I don’t plan to go into the details, it is really boring by now that this dictatorship still bothers itself with the formalities of preserving the idea that somehow there is a democracy in place in Venezuela. Who is Chavez sending a message to? Who belives him by now?

Whe  you control institutions the way Chavez does and when the law is reinterpreted at will, why even bother? In fact, the most affected group is not even the opposition, who by now is used to the abuses, but pro-Chavez party Patria Para Todos (PPT), which will be seriously affected by the changes and will likely lose many of its Deputies if the new law is approved, which led the party to threaten to propose a referendum of the electoral Bill.

Clearly, Chavez care less about PPT. He tried once to force them to merge PPT into his party PSUV and gave in, maybe he will not give in this time around and will tell them to leave the Government if they don’t like it. Just think, bad enough to get used to ahving Ismael Garcia on the oppositon, who woudl want to welcome Aristobulo Isturiz or some of the other PPT leaders?

But this is much like lying day after day about everything: The Government is not happy controlling 99%, it wants to control everything, just in case. And what motivates this Electoral Bill is the thought, God forbid! that the opposition could get some 30 or 40 positions and debates in the National Assembly could get noisy, after four years of total control of discussions and Bills.

Ths, make some small chnages, give the CNE even more power to manipulate than it does and voila!, the opposition will not get more than 15 or 20 positions if the votings districts are redesigned properly.

But why bother? How long does Chavez want to maintain the charade that his  revolution has anything to do with a democracy? And what for? Chavez always had Dictatorial intentons, which he has only expressed fully in the last few months, but somehow he thinks someone somehwere needs to be convinced that he is not.

So, we will be distracted with this Electoral Bill, PPT will put up or shut up and in the end Chavez will do whatever he wants like he has done in the last few years. The same minority representation that allowed all of the parties that backed Chavez in 1998 to thrive in the much derided democarcy of the IVth. Republic will be dead, insuring that Chavismo will be even more permanently encroached in power for years to come.

6 Responses to “New Electoral Bill: When 99% control is not enough”

  1. Gringo Says:

    While the PSF chant their mantra: DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED, DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED, DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED.

  2. Robert Says:

    To borrow a phrase from another blog of late, cubanization would require a one party system. This won’t happen in Venezuela so the obvious solution is to insure only one party is in control. Same result, right?

  3. Thomas Mohr Says:

    Robert,

    cubanization is not necessary. It is sufficient that Chavez adopts a system like in the German Democratic Republic which had 5 parties (even a christian democratic one !) which where summarized as “block parties” because they where in one block with the SED. Exactly this is what Chavez is doing now.

  4. Kepler Says:

    Thomas is right.

    I had written about gerrymandering in my English blog already a couple of months ago. This is just the beginning…and people won’t do anything for the next months because most poor still have how to eat and Chavez can still pawn half Venezuela for enough bean bags and beer.

  5. Kepler Says:

    It is a pity you don’t write this in Spanish.

  6. GeronL Says:

    I remember an election in Texas where the statewide vote was 60% or so for the GOP but they did not get a majority of the seats in Congress. I remember the Dems putting on protests and even walkouts (leaving the state) to make the districts more representative.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 11,831 other followers

%d bloggers like this: